Re: Polyphase merge is obsolete
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Polyphase merge is obsolete |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7ad9d969-f25c-2c54-a9df-4bea09a11301@iki.fi обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Polyphase merge is obsolete (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/12/2016 08:27 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> writes: >> The beauty of the polyphase merge algorithm is that it allows reusing >> input tapes as output tapes efficiently ... So the whole idea of trying to >> efficiently reuse input tapes as output tapes is pointless. > > It's been awhile since I looked at that code, but I'm quite certain that > it *never* thought it was dealing with actual tapes. Rather, the point of > sticking with polyphase merge was that it allowed efficient incremental > re-use of temporary disk files, so that the maximum on-disk footprint was > only about equal to the volume of data to be sorted, rather than being a > multiple of that. Have we thrown that property away? No, there's no difference to that behavior. logtape.c takes care of incremental re-use of disk space, regardless of the merging pattern. - Heikki
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: