Re: Replication
| От | Mike Christensen |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Replication |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 7aa638e00906241213v1e1d0d63p2174afc633fcfd98@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Replication (Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Replication
Re: Replication Re: Replication |
| Список | pgsql-general |
We need to stop this thread, you guys are making me want to ditch Postgres and get Oracle (after taking out a second mortgage on my house that is)..
Mike
Mike
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net> wrote:
Craig Ringer wrote on 24.06.2009 04:07:As far as I know it is also a cluster of servers which can even hand over the processing of a single statement "in-flight" if the node goes down that is current processing the statement.Thomas Kellerer wrote:Mike Christensen wrote on 23.06.2009 19:37:Does anyone actually have that (any node can go down and the others stillI think this is what Oracle promises with their RAC technology.
replicate amongst themselves?)
Isn't RAC a shared-storage cluster?
Thomas
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: