Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys
От | Drouvot, Bertrand |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7a99c746-37ee-f77a-48b1-44b3639138f6@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On 4/4/23 1:43 PM, Amit Kapila wrote: > On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 3:14 PM Drouvot, Bertrand > <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > > +static inline bool > +LogicalReplicationSlotXidsConflict(ReplicationSlot *s, TransactionId xid) > +{ > + TransactionId slot_xmin; > + TransactionId slot_catalog_xmin; > + > + slot_xmin = s->data.xmin; > + slot_catalog_xmin = s->data.catalog_xmin; > + > + return (((TransactionIdIsValid(slot_xmin) && > TransactionIdPrecedesOrEquals(slot_xmin, xid)) || > > For logical slots, slot->data.xmin will always be an > InvalidTransactionId. It will only be set/updated for physical slots. > So, it is not clear to me why in this and other related functions, you > are referring to and or invalidating it. > I think you're right that invalidating/checking only on the catalog xmin is enough for logical slot (I'm not sure how I ended up taking the xmin into account but that seems useless indeed). I'll submit a new version to deal with the catalog xmin only, thanks! Regards, -- Bertrand Drouvot PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: