Re: [POC] Fast COPY FROM command for the table with foreignpartitions
От | Andrey Lepikhov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [POC] Fast COPY FROM command for the table with foreignpartitions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7a3c3bdd-dc43-68a7-7cc5-ae139f1de4a7@postgrespro.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [POC] Fast COPY FROM command for the table with foreign partitions (Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [POC] Fast COPY FROM command for the table with foreign partitions
Re: [POC] Fast COPY FROM command for the table with foreign partitions |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thank you for the answer, 02.06.2020 05:02, Etsuro Fujita пишет: > I think I also thought something similar to this before [1]. Will take a look. > [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/23990375-45a6-5823-b0aa-a6a7a6a957f0%40lab.ntt.co.jp > I have looked into the thread. My first version of the patch was like your idea. But when developing the “COPY FROM” code, the following features were discovered: 1. Two or more partitions can be placed at the same node. We need to finish COPY into one partition before start COPY into another partition at the same node. 2. On any error we need to send EOF to all started "COPY .. FROM STDIN" operations. Otherwise FDW can't cancel operation. Hiding the COPY code under the buffers management machinery allows us to generalize buffers machinery, execute one COPY operation on each buffer and simplify error handling. As i understand, main idea of the thread, mentioned by you, is to add "COPY FROM" support without changes in FDW API. It is possible to remove BeginForeignCopy() and EndForeignCopy() from the patch. But it is not trivial to change ExecForeignInsert() for the COPY purposes. All that I can offer in this place now is to introduce one new ExecForeignBulkInsert(buf) routine that will execute single "COPY FROM STDIN" operation, send tuples and close the operation. We can use the ExecForeignInsert() routine for each buffer tuple if ExecForeignBulkInsert() is not supported. One of main questions here is to use COPY TO machinery for serializing a tuple. It is needed (if you will take a look into the patch) to transform the CopyTo() routine to an iterative representation: start/next/finish. May it be acceptable? In the attachment there is a patch with the correction of a stupid error. -- Andrey Lepikhov Postgres Professional https://postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: