Re: BUG #6425: Bus error in slot_deform_tuple

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Duncan Rance
Тема Re: BUG #6425: Bus error in slot_deform_tuple
Дата
Msg-id 7F89C398-A270-45C4-893C-23AB24A81CFC@dunquino.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: BUG #6425: Bus error in slot_deform_tuple  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: BUG #6425: Bus error in slot_deform_tuple  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-bugs
On 3 Feb 2012, at 06:45, Tom Lane wrote:
>=20
> I probably ought to let the test case run overnight before concluding
> anything, but at this point it's run for two-plus hours with no errors
> after applying this patch:
>=20
> diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/trans=
am/xlog.c

Thank Tom! I've had this running for a few hours now without problems. Prev=
iously, on Sparc, the problem would occur in less than a minute.

I did try a build with --enable-cassert and it didn't actually cause the pr=
oblem. I think I left it for about an hour. Although a a relatively modern =
machine, this Sparc box I am using is painfully slow. My guess is that the =
extra time taken to perform the Assert code is hiding the problem.

Now it's time to persuade the customer to use a patched version of pg ;)

Cheers,
Duncan

P.S. I've been looking for an OS project to contribute to, and I think I'll=
 see if I can help with pg. Time to look a the TODO list :)=

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #6347: Reopening bug #6085
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #6425: Bus error in slot_deform_tuple