Re: BUG #6425: Bus error in slot_deform_tuple
От | Duncan Rance |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #6425: Bus error in slot_deform_tuple |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7F89C398-A270-45C4-893C-23AB24A81CFC@dunquino.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #6425: Bus error in slot_deform_tuple (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #6425: Bus error in slot_deform_tuple
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On 3 Feb 2012, at 06:45, Tom Lane wrote: >=20 > I probably ought to let the test case run overnight before concluding > anything, but at this point it's run for two-plus hours with no errors > after applying this patch: >=20 > diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/trans= am/xlog.c Thank Tom! I've had this running for a few hours now without problems. Prev= iously, on Sparc, the problem would occur in less than a minute. I did try a build with --enable-cassert and it didn't actually cause the pr= oblem. I think I left it for about an hour. Although a a relatively modern = machine, this Sparc box I am using is painfully slow. My guess is that the = extra time taken to perform the Assert code is hiding the problem. Now it's time to persuade the customer to use a patched version of pg ;) Cheers, Duncan P.S. I've been looking for an OS project to contribute to, and I think I'll= see if I can help with pg. Time to look a the TODO list :)=
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: