Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
От | Vivek Khera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases ( |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7F33229E-AE95-436B-AB2F-01AC023DD7EE@khera.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases ( ("Luke Lonergan" <llonergan@greenplum.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Nov 18, 2005, at 1:07 AM, Luke Lonergan wrote: > A $1,000 system with one CPU and two SATA disks in a software RAID0 > will > perform exactly the same as a $80,000 system with 8 dual core CPUs > and the > world's best SCSI RAID hardware on a large database for decision > support > (what the poster asked about). Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha! Whooo... needed to fall out of my chair laughing this morning. I can tell you from direct personal experience that you're just plain wrong. I've had to move my primary DB server from a dual P3 1GHz with 4-disk RAID10 SCSI, to Dual P3 2GHz with 14-disk RAID10 and faster drives, to Dual Opteron 2GHz with 8-disk RAID10 and even faster disks to keep up with my load on a 60+ GB database. The Dual opteron system has just a little bit of extra capacity if I offload some of the reporting operations to a replicated copy (via slony1). If I run all the queries on the one DB it can't keep up. One most telling point about the difference in speed is that the 14- disk array system cannot keep up with the replication being generated by the dual opteron, even when it is no doing any other queries of its own. The I/O system just ain't fast enough.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: