Re: RAID stripe size question
От | Mikael Carneholm |
---|---|
Тема | Re: RAID stripe size question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7F10D26ECFA1FB458B89C5B4B0D72C2B4E4C31@sesrv12.wirelesscar.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RAID stripe size question ("Mikael Carneholm" <Mikael.Carneholm@WirelessCar.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: RAID stripe size question
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
> This is a relatively low end HBA with 1 4Gb FC on it. Max sustained IO on it is going to be ~320MBps. Or ~ enough for an 8 HD RAID 10 set made of 75MBps ASTR HD's. Looking at http://h30094.www3.hp.com/product.asp?sku=2260908&extended=1, I notice that the controller has a Ultra160 SCSI interface which implies that the theoretical max throughput is 160Mb/s. Ouch. However, what's more important is the seeks/s - ~530/s on a 28 disk array is quite lousy compared to the 1400/s on a 12 x 15Kdisk array as mentioned by Mark here: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2006-07/msg00170.php. Could be the disk RPM (10K vs 15K) that makes the difference here... I will test another stripe size (128K) for the DATA lun (28 disks) to see what difference that makes, I think I read somewhere that linux flushes blocks of 128K at a time, so it might be worth evaluating. /Mikael
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: