Re: PostgreSQL not ACID compliant?
От | Zak Greant |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL not ACID compliant? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7F0CC394-EEE8-11D7-B4F5-000393D4C58E@mysql.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL not ACID compliant? (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wednesday, Sep 24, 2003, at 19:10 Atlantic/Reykjavik, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Philip Yarra wrote: >> It's funny timing - I had to prepare a comparison between PostgreSQL >> and >> MySQL recently, explaining why we would prefer PostgreSQL. I know some >> people here have issues with the MySQL crashme test results, but I >> have to >> say I found it possibly one of the best postgreSQL advertisements >> available. A 4-way comparison between Sybase, Oracle, MySQL and >> PostgreSQL >> shows PostgreSQL in an extremely flattering light. > > They have been improving their fairness over at MySQL. I know Zak > Greant (added as CC) removed all the inaccurate PostgreSQL stuff that > was in the MySQL manuals. Hi Bruce and all, Thanks for the Cc: and for noticing the fixes! To be fair, Paul DuBois and Andrey Stroganov did the actual work - I only did some pointing and grunting. I am not sure that we have removed everything yet - I still need to do a full sweep of the docs. In any case, this is a good start Also, I noticed the long GPL/MySQL related thread on [GENERAL]. It looked like there are some good points in the discussion. Once I get some other licensing-related issues taken care up, I will take a look at cleaning up the licensing overview docs that were mentioned and critiqued. Cheers! --zak
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: