Re: Postgres is using 100% CPU
От | Graeme B. Bell |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres is using 100% CPU |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7EF5206B-3427-4349-A0A1-974862D61017@skogoglandskap.no обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Postgres is using 100% CPU (Ashik S L <ashiksl178@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgres is using 100% CPU
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Yves Dorfsman <yves@zioup.com> wrote: >> That's the thing, even on an old laptop with a slow IDE disk, 273 > individual >> inserts should not take more than a second. > I think that would depend on settings such as synchronous_commit, commit_delay, or whether 2-phase commit is being used. If synchronous commit is enabled and commit_delay was not used (e.g. 0), and you have a client synchronously making individualinserts to the DB (1 transaction each), then surely you have delays due to waiting for each transaction to commitsynchronously to WAL on disk? I believe yes / 0 are the default settings for synchronous commit and commit_delay. (Interestingly the manual pages do notspecify.) Assuming a 5400RPM laptop drive (which is a typical drive - some laptop drives run < 5000RPM), and assuming you are writinga sequential log to disk (with very short gaps between entries being added, e.g. no seek time, only rotational latency)will mean 5400 transactions per minute, 1 write per rotation. That's a maximum 90 transactions per second synchronised to WAL. It would take just over 3 seconds. Ashik, try altering your postgresql.conf to say 'commit_delay=100' or 'synchronous_commit=off'. Let us know if that fixesthe problem. Read up on the options before you change them. Graeme Bell
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: