Re: NVL vs COALESCE
От | Michael Glaesemann |
---|---|
Тема | Re: NVL vs COALESCE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7DF53811-C757-4F1C-9FFE-44D227AF3CD2@myrealbox.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | NVL vs COALESCE (Marcus Engene <mengpg@engene.se>) |
Ответы |
Re: NVL vs COALESCE
Re: NVL vs COALESCE |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Nov 24, 2005, at 21:21 , Marcus Engene wrote: > When we're having an alias discussion, I'd really like to see NVL > in postgres. Not because of porting from oracle as much as just > spelling that without the reference manual is completely impossible. NVL: what a very unfortunate spelling. (NULL VaLue? NULL Valued Logic? Named Very Loosely? Someone help me here :) ) AFAICT, COALESCE is SQL standard, while NVL isn't. I think an index entry might be a good idea. Michael Glaesemann grzm myrealbox com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: