Re: 7 hrs for a pg_restore?
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 7 hrs for a pg_restore? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7D7AD56B-7AEE-41F5-A2A6-EE1D6B80B656@fastcrypt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 7 hrs for a pg_restore? (Douglas J Hunley <doug@hunley.homeip.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: 7 hrs for a pg_restore?
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 19-Feb-08, at 2:35 PM, Douglas J Hunley wrote: > On Tuesday 19 February 2008 14:28:54 Dave Cramer wrote: >> shared buffers is *way* too small as is effective cache >> set them to 2G/6G respectively. >> >> Dave > > pardon my ignorance, but is this in the context of a restore only? > or 'in > general'? This is the "generally accepted" starting point for a pg db for production. > > > -- > Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778 > http://doug.hunley.homeip.net > > Don't let Kirk show you what he affectionately calls the "Captain's > Log" > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to > choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not > match
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: