> On 18 Sep 2025, at 7:28 AM, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 10:26:12AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Saying that, this patch sounds like a good idea, making these code
>> paths a bit more reliable for VACUUM, without paying the cost of an
>> allocation. At least for HEAD, that's nice to have. Peter, what do
>> you think?
>
> Hearing nothing, I'm planning to have a second look at it and do
> something on HEAD. Feel free if you have any comments.
> —
> Michael
Attached please find rebased version of the patch with fixed mistypings.