Re: BUG? res.next() == false, but psql finds tuples?
От | Palle Girgensohn |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG? res.next() == false, but psql finds tuples? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7D160FC0C5EC5E58B87529F6@palle.girgensohn.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG? res.next() == false, but psql finds tuples? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG? res.next() == false, but psql finds tuples?
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
--On fredag, april 22, 2005 18.24.07 -0400 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Palle Girgensohn <girgen@pingpong.net> writes: >> hmmm.... is there any way to use the server's prepared statements from >> psql? > > psql can't use the V3 protocol facilities, which means that you can't > duplicate the case very closely. > > After reading your report this morning, I made a little test program > using libpq's PQexecParams (basically a quick hack on > src/test/examples/testlibpq3.c) to duplicate your query. I didn't > see any misbehavior; so there is some additional triggering condition > beyond what you've told us. > > Given that the query packet looks 100% reasonable by eyeball, it seems > unlikely that the issue is on the JDBC side (barring obvious snafus such > as connecting to a different database than psql is talking to). But I > don't have any data with which to pursue the hypothesis of a server bug. Hmm, yes, there is indeed one thing I didn't tell you... the server is patches with my ICU patch. That might be a problem? The patch is at http://people.freebsd.org/~girgen/postgresql-icu I'll check modifying testlipg3.c with my server, and see what happens. /Palle
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: