Re: Quad Xeon or Quad Opteron?
От | Reid Thompson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Quad Xeon or Quad Opteron? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7C0800F63CCF4149AC0FC5EE2A04122611FCF5@sr002-2k3exc.ateb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Quad Xeon or Quad Opteron? (Andrzej Zawadzki <zawadaa@wp.pl>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
This may be of interest...
http://weblog.infoworld.com/yager/archives/2008/05/ahead_of_the_cu_4.html
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org on behalf of Andrzej Zawadzki
Sent: Fri 5/23/2008 6:41 AM
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: [PERFORM] Quad Xeon or Quad Opteron?
Hello,
We're planning new production server for PostgreSQL and I'm wondering
which processor (or even platform) will be better: Quad Xeon or Quad
Opteron (for example SUN now has a new offer Sun Fire X4440 x64).
When I was buying my last database server, then SUN v40z was a really
very good choice (Intel's base server was slower). This v40z still works
pretty good but I need one more.
AFAIK Intel made some changes in chipset but... is this better then AMD
HyperTransport and Direct Connect Architecture from database point of
view? How about L3 cache - is this important for performance?
Do You have any opinions? Suggestions?
Thanks,
Best regards
--
Andrzej Zawadzki
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: