Re: Is this a security risk?
От | Adam Witney |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is this a security risk? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7AB54740-A5E1-4939-B49A-93BE58587924@sgul.ac.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Is this a security risk? ("Albe Laurenz" <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: Is this a security risk?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 17 Dec 2008, at 07:48, Albe Laurenz wrote: > Adam Witney wrote: >> I would like to provide a limited view of my database to some users, >> so i thought of creating a second database (I can control access by >> IP >> address through pg_hba.conf) with some views that queried the first >> database using dblink. > > In my opinion dblink is not the right tool for that. > It will require a user account on the "secret" database through which > dblink accesses it. You'd have to restrict permissions for that user > if you want to keep the thing secure. > > So why not access the "secret" database directly with that user and > get rid of the added difficulty of dblink? > > You can rely on the permission system. Just grant the user the > appropriate > privileges on the necessary objects, and if you need the user to see > only part of the data in a table, create a view for that. thanks for your reply, The user already has permissions within the 'secret' database, but normally they interact with it through a web interface only. I was worried that the user could get in and mess around with other things, such as the sequences which are used to populate primary keys. Also ideally I only wanted to create a read only access to certain parts of the database, I couldn't think of any other way to do it... are there any more standard ways of doing this? thanks again adam
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: