Re: What's special about 1916-10-01 02:25:20? Odd jump in internal timestamptz representation
От | Alistair Bayley |
---|---|
Тема | Re: What's special about 1916-10-01 02:25:20? Odd jump in internal timestamptz representation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 79d7c4980608230552q4d592853j82bf06b376df83e6@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: What's special about 1916-10-01 02:25:20? Odd jump in internal timestamptz representation (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: What's special about 1916-10-01 02:25:20? Odd jump in internal timestamptz representation
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 18/08/06, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > "Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes: > > > No, it's a work of a simplistic perlscript IIRC. It simply looked for > > the first match it could find, based on the list found in the registry > > (the whole concept is a bit of an ugly hack, but it's the best we could > > come up with). If there is a more fitting timezone for it, it should be > > changed. > > I guess the question is whether, when Windows is using this setting, > it tracks British summer time rules or not. Would someone check? > > regards, tom lane What would a reasonable check be? I can start the Windows command prompt and type "time /t" which gives me the current local time (adjusted for daylight savings). In the Windows Date/Time dialogue there is a "Automatically adjust clock for daylight saving changes" checkbox, which is checked. I don't know what registry setting this maps to, though. Alistair
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: