Re: Publishing 14 source snapshots?

On 9/17/21 5:28 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 10:49 PM Jacob Champion <pchampion@vmware.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 2021-09-16 at 15:59 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> > Jacob Champion <pchampion@vmware.com> writes:
>> > > Absolutely -- this isn't a hard blocker for us; it's just a special
>> > > case in our CI that I'd rather didn't exist... Maybe it'd be worthwhile
>> > > to ask on -hackers for an update to the snapshot policy?
>> >
>> > This would be the right list to ask for that, I think.  -hackers doesn't
>> > deal in website issues.
>>
>> Cool. Consider this a feature request, then, to have dev snapshots for
>> every STABLE branch, even during beta periods, for CIs that are
>> watching the latest development state and want to be handed a tarball
>> rather than git-clone. (It's not a big deal in the end, just an
>> annoyance.)
> 
> This is much simpler than what's been speculated about in this thread.
> 
> REL_14_STABLE was simply not added to the list of what to build for.
> Because, well, nobody did that.
> 
> FWIW, you can also see this by looking at which branches the buildfarm
> animal guaibasaurus builds for because it's the same list.
> 
> I've enabled it now and kicked off  a run, so it should show up shortly.


The next logical question is, what process/procedure/script should this 
be added to so that it happens next time without extra prodding ;-)

Joe
-- 
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development