Re: GUC patch for Win32

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Where exactly is the interlock to ensure that the new backend will end up
>> with the correct settings if someone is changing the values at about
>> the time of the fork?

> Postmaster creates a new file, then does rename() to move it to the name
> used by the backends.  It can't move it until the file is not in use.

And?

How exactly does that guarantee that the new backend will see an update
occurring at about the same time?  I'm pretty sure that GUC is fired up
before backends start listening to signals (and that's assuming the
Windows port has a Unixy idea of signal response, which I seem to recall
you telling me wasn't the case).

            regards, tom lane