RE: BUG #18168: Parallel worker failed to initialize: could not create inherited socket: error code 10106
От | Boyer, Maxime (he/him | il/lui) |
---|---|
Тема | RE: BUG #18168: Parallel worker failed to initialize: could not create inherited socket: error code 10106 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 794802dcff4b44e393f650efc9311f5a@cra-arc.gc.ca обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #18168: Parallel worker failed to initialize: could not create inherited socket: error code 10106 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #18168: Parallel worker failed to initialize: could not create inherited socket: error code 10106
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
> FWIW, the PG code that throws that error message is old enough to vote; > it's not something we changed in a recent minor release. Yeah, that's what I thought :'D > I am guessing you saw the impact of some external event, but I don't know what. Fair enough. This happened the day after reverting to 11, because of the memory error on 14, but I also doubt it's related.I was stopping one of the application node at the time. Maybe a Windows thing, or something related to the firmwareupdates. We can leave it there for now then. We might try to fallback to see if it happens again. Thanks, Maxime -----Original Message----- From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Sent: October 25, 2023 10:21 AM To: Boyer, Maxime (he/him | il/lui) <Maxime.Boyer@cra-arc.gc.ca> Cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: BUG #18168: Parallel worker failed to initialize: could not create inherited socket: error code 10106 PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes: > New firmware were installed on the server, this happened after > restarting the server. Since then, the database runs on a secondary > server without issue. That server received the same updates. We > haven't tried moving it back as this is our production database. Was this a fluke? > 83 identical errors were logged in the system Event Viewer: > could not create inherited socket: error code 10106 FWIW, the PG code that throws that error message is old enough to vote; it's not something we changed in a recent minor release. So I doubt the PG upgrade was the triggering factor. I am guessing you saw the impact of some external event, but I don't know what. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: