Re: RC2 and open issues
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: RC2 and open issues |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7942.1103642808@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: RC2 and open issues (Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: RC2 and open issues
Re: RC2 and open issues |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com> writes: > However, one thing you can say is that if block B hasn't been written to > since you last checked, then any blocks older than that haven't been > written to either. [ itch... ] Can you? I don't recall exactly when a block gets pushed up the ARC list during a ReadBuffer/WriteBuffer cycle, but at the very least I'd have to say that this assumption is vulnerable to race conditions. Also, the cntxDirty mechanism allows a block to be dirtied without changing the ARC state at all. I am not very clear on whether Vadim added that mechanism just for performance or because there were fundamental deadlock issues without it; but in either case we'd have to think long and hard about taking it out for the bgwriter's benefit. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: