Re: WIP: About CMake v2
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WIP: About CMake v2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7931.1441116344@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WIP: About CMake v2 (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: WIP: About CMake v2
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > I guess I'm a bit skeptical about the idea of porting to a new build > system. There's a good chance of replacing the problems we know about > with new problems that are no less serious, but merely unknown to us. > But I'm not going to stand here and hold my breath if everyone else > thinks it's a good idea. FWIW, I'm also skeptical that this experiment will succeed. I think it is worth trying ... but I'm by no means promising to buy into the result. There is precedent for this sort of thing: mysql converted from autoconf+gmake to cmake a few years back, and AFAIK they've not regretted it. So that's a data point that a project of complexity more or less similar to ours can make the change. Where I do *not* want to end up is maintaining *three* build systems. So I'll definitely resist any proposals to commit a partly-done cmake conversion (which I fear might seem attractive at some point). regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: