Re: Replace is_publishable_class() with relispublishable column in pg_class

On 17.12.25 08:07, Peter Smith wrote:
> 0. AFAIK, anything named with a "pg_" prefix generally means that the
> named thing is intended for PG internal use, right?

This might be a convention, but it's not enforced by the system, except 
for some object types like schemas and tablespaces.