Re: Predefined role pg_maintenance for VACUUM, ANALYZE, CHECKPOINT.
От | Vik Fearing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Predefined role pg_maintenance for VACUUM, ANALYZE, CHECKPOINT. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 78d935e1-a9ad-2d8d-8ff7-9761566d820e@postgresfriends.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Predefined role pg_maintenance for VACUUM, ANALYZE, CHECKPOINT. (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Predefined role pg_maintenance for VACUUM, ANALYZE, CHECKPOINT.
Re: Predefined role pg_maintenance for VACUUM, ANALYZE, CHECKPOINT. Re: Predefined role pg_maintenance for VACUUM, ANALYZE, CHECKPOINT. |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/2/21 4:06 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > There's bound to be somebody who wants to grant some of > these permissions and not others, or who wants to grant the ability to > run those commands on some tables but not others. Is there anything stopping us from adding syntax like this? GRANT VACUUM, ANALYZE ON TABLE foo TO bar; That doesn't fix the CHECKPOINT issue, but surely vacuum and analyze can be done that way. I would much prefer that over new predefined roles. This would be nice, but there is nothing to hang our hat on: GRANT CHECKPOINT TO username; -- Vik Fearing
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: