Re: Postgres memory usage
От | Jeff |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres memory usage |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 788DA9FF-07FE-11D9-8F3E-000D9366F0C4@torgo.978.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgres memory usage (ruben <ruben20@superguai.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Sep 16, 2004, at 11:26 AM, ruben wrote: > Thanks Jeff: > > This is the output of free: > > total used free shared buffers cached > Mem: 1031012 1018608 12404 0 64984 848160 > -/+ buffers/cache: 105464 925548 > Swap: 2040244 0 2040244 > a vast majority of your ram is all in cache. thats is good. It means the memory isn't being wasted. > shared_buffers and sort_mem are both commented in postgresql.conf: > > -bash-2.05b$ grep shared_buf data/postgresql.conf > #shared_buffers = 64 # 2*max_connections, min 16 > -bash-2.05b$ grep sort_m data/postgresql.conf > #sort_mem = 512 # min 32 > that is an extremely small value of shared buffers. you should set it to at least 1000, maybe even 10000. You'll likely get a nice performance boost by increasing it. > I have verified that postgres is not the responsible for the low > performance of the system, but I just wanted to be sure that memory > usage is reasonable in a postgres installation. > Yes. It is fine, except I'd increase shared_buffers -- Jeff Trout <jeff@jefftrout.com> http://www.jefftrout.com/ http://www.stuarthamm.net/
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: