Re: pg_dump problem
От | SHARMILA JOTHIRAJAH |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump problem |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 787442.58997.qm@web31103.mail.mud.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pg_dump problem (SHARMILA JOTHIRAJAH <sharmi_jo@yahoo.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
You are right. There are no rows in pg_class with oids 670739 and 670741. Is that the problem? How do I fix that. Will deleting those rows from pg_depend fix this problem?
Also I have another question. Should the pg tables (like pg_class etc) generally be vacuumed regularly?
Thanks
sharmila
----- Original Message ----
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: SHARMILA JOTHIRAJAH <sharmi_jo@yahoo.com>
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 3:33:20 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_dump problem
SHARMILA JOTHIRAJAH <sharmi_jo@yahoo.com> writes:
> looks like the OIDs are there....
Yeah, that makes it look more like the pg_class row went missing
than that there was an intentional drop of the view.
Does "VACUUM VERBOSE pg_class" report anything interesting?
It's possible also that reindexing pg_class would fix it.
regards, tom lane
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: SHARMILA JOTHIRAJAH <sharmi_jo@yahoo.com>
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 3:33:20 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_dump problem
SHARMILA JOTHIRAJAH <sharmi_jo@yahoo.com> writes:
> looks like the OIDs are there....
Yeah, that makes it look more like the pg_class row went missing
than that there was an intentional drop of the view.
Does "VACUUM VERBOSE pg_class" report anything interesting?
It's possible also that reindexing pg_class would fix it.
regards, tom lane
Be a better sports nut! Let your teams follow you with Yahoo Mobile. Try it now.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: