Re: COPY, lock release and MVCC

On Thu, 2020-05-14 at 15:11 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> LGTM.  I have slightly modified the commit message, see if that looks
> fine to you.

Fine with me, thanks.

> This breaks the cases where a REPEATABLE READ transaction could see an
> empty table if it repeats a COPY statement and somebody truncated the
> table in the meantime.

I would use "case" rather than "cases" here.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe