Re: backup manifests
| От | Fujii Masao |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: backup manifests |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 777d236e-f46c-8099-bb5e-a6e4efc43999@oss.nttdata.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: backup manifests (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: backup manifests
Re: backup manifests |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020/04/09 2:35, Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 1:15 AM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote: >> When there is a backup_manifest in the database cluster, it's included in >> the backup even when --no-manifest is specified. ISTM that this is problematic >> because the backup_manifest is obviously not valid for the backup. >> So, isn't it better to always exclude the *existing* backup_manifest in the >> cluster from the backup, like backup_label/tablespace_map? Patch attached. >> >> Also I found the typo in the document. Patch attached. > > Both patches look good. The second one is definitely a mistake on my > part, and the first one seems like a totally reasonable change. > Thanks! Thanks for reviewing them! I pushed them. Please note that the commit messages have not been delivered to pgsql-committers yet. Regards, -- Fujii Masao Advanced Computing Technology Center Research and Development Headquarters NTT DATA CORPORATION
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: