Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table
От | Jesper Pedersen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 776a16c8-e0b4-f609-632a-961e3fe96f78@redhat.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Alvaro, On 01/18/2018 04:43 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Here's a patch to add pg_dump tests. This verifies that the > CREATE INDEX on parent and partition appear, as well as ALTER INDEX .. > ATTACH PARTITION. > > While doing this, I noticed a small bug: the ALTER INDEX would not be > dumped when only one of the schemas are specified to pg_dump (schema of > parent and schema of partition), but it would be if both were specified. > This patch fixes that problem too. AFAICS the test is correct after > that fix (ie. the "like" and "unlike" sets are correct now.) > I get pg_restore: creating INDEX "pg_catalog.pg_authid_oid_index" pg_restore: [archiver (db)] Error while PROCESSING TOC: pg_restore: [archiver (db)] Error from TOC entry 5493; 1259 2677 INDEX pg_authid_oid_index jpedersen pg_restore: [archiver (db)] could not execute query: ERROR: permission denied: "pg_authid" is a system catalog Command was: -- For binary upgrade, must preserve pg_class oids SELECT pg_catalog.binary_upgrade_set_next_index_pg_class_oid('2677'::pg_catalog.oid); CREATE UNIQUE INDEX "pg_authid_oid_index" ON "pg_authid" USING "btree" ("oid"); during check-world. Best regards, Jesper
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: