Re: Documentation building broken in CFBot
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Documentation building broken in CFBot |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 776919.1606580932@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Documentation building broken in CFBot (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Documentation building broken in CFBot
|
Список | pgsql-www |
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> writes: > On 2020-11-27 18:53, Tom Lane wrote: >> Ah, I see there used to be more things in docbook.m4, so removing the >> file altogether isn't feasible before v11. But we could still drop >> the PGAC_CHECK_DOCBOOK macro, no? Even in the older branches, there >> is nothing paying attention to have_docbook. > Well, my point of having this as a mini test suite of the installation > still applies there, especially since it uses the old tool set that is > more difficult to install correctly. Those old tools have no network > functionality, so there is really no configure speed to be gained. I > would leave it alone. Wow, has it really only been three years that configure has acted this way? But anyway, after testing on a system that has opensp installed but not docbook, I confirm that the DocBook test falls through quickly pre-v11. Agreed then that we only need this change in 11 and up. > In any case, note that there is also documentation about this at > <https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/docguide-toolsets.html#DOCGUIDE-TOOLSETS-CONFIGURE> > that would need to be updated to the new behavior. I think the phrase > "If xmllint was not found then some of the following tests will be > skipped." could be removed, since it referred to the DocBook test about > to be removed. Right. That also seems like a good place to add a hint about setting XMLLINT to 'xmllint --nonet' if you don't want remote fetches to happen while building the docs. Shall we do that instead of applying the patch you posted earlier? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: