Re: Open 7.3 items
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Open 7.3 items |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7749.1029509322@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Open 7.3 items (Lee Kindness <lkindness@csl.co.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: Open 7.3 items
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Lee Kindness <lkindness@csl.co.uk> writes: > Vince Vielhaber writes: >>> [ 'user@' patch ] >>> whim. Then again as long as 7.2.1 is stable enough for me there's >>> no reason to upgrade 'cuze I damn sure ain't going back and changing >>> all sorts of programs and scripts that have global users. > Having read bits and pieces of this thread, can those in favour > confirm that this would be an effect of this patch? I think Vince is talking through his hat. The proposed flag wouldn't ever be enabled by default. If someone did turn it on in their installation "on a whim", they'd soon turn it off again if they didn't like the effects. I do not see much difference between the above argument and arguing "we shouldn't have i18n support, because if I turned it on on a whim I wouldn't be able to read my error messages". Once again: *no one* has at any time suggested that any form of this patch should affect the default behavior in the slightest. > Also what effect would adding significance to '@' in the context of > usernames have, if any, on the current use of it as a database/host > separator (in ECPG, certainly would be useful in the utilities too)? Well, I don't see any difficulty there, but if you are aware of a context where it'd be a problem, point it out! regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: