Re: GNU readline and BSD license
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: GNU readline and BSD license |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7732.978133418@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: GNU readline and BSD license (Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: GNU readline and BSD license
Re: GNU readline and BSD license |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org> writes: > How different is the feature set? I was going to ask the same thing. If it's an exact replacement then OK, but I do not want to put up with non-Emacs-compatible keybindings, to mention just one likely issue. The whole thing really strikes me as make-work anyway. Linux is GPL'd; does anyone want to argue that we shouldn't run on Linux? Since we are not including libreadline in our distribution, there is NO reason to worry about using it when it's available. Wanting to find a replacement purely because of the license amounts to license bigotry, IMHO. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: