On 2/15/20 1:57 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hm. So, these oversights are certainly bugs in narrow terms. However,
> they've all been like that for a *long* time --- the three instances
> you found date to 2005, 2006, and 2008 according to "git blame".
> The complete lack of complaints shows that nobody cares. So I think
> a fairly strong case could be made for going the other way, ie
> s/$(LN_S)/ln -s/g and get rid of the configure-time cycles wasted in
> setting up that variable.
Here is a patch which does that.
Andreas