Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7708.1011997574@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects (Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@netbsd.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@netbsd.org> writes: > Specifically to the question of schema pathing, why would you want it to > be session-settable? Either your DB app is designed to work w/ schemas, or > it isn't. So that you can set the correct mode for your client application. It is silly to suppose that an installation-wide or even database-wide setting is sufficient. Consider for example a database shared by multiple pieces of client software; wouldn't you like to be able to upgrade them to schema-awareness one at a time? You could possibly make a case for a single setting per user, but even that makes an assumption (user == client software) that I think is not reasonable for us to force on all Postgres installations. Basically I haven't got a lot of patience for arguments that say we do not need flexibility. There are more people out there, using Postgres in more different ways, than either you or I know about. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: