Re: Streaming replication and postmaster signaling

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> That may well be so, but adding another one is not going to improve
> the situation even a little bit.  I don't think what you're saying
> weakens in the slightest the argument that I was making, namely, that
> if this isn't committed RSN it should be postponed to 8.6.  Do you
> disagree?

Well, the argument to my mind is about a suitable value of "RSN".
I think you were stating that we should bounce SR if it's not committed
before the final commitfest starts (ie, next week).  I think we can give
it more slack than that.  Maybe the end of the fest (where the length of
the fest is determined by the other open patches)?
        regards, tom lane