On 22.03.24 14:59, Robert Haas wrote:
> And I don't believe that if someone were writing a physical book about
> PostgreSQL from scratch, they'd ever end up with a top-level chapter
> that looks anything like our GiST chapter. All of the index AM
> chapters are quite obviously clones of each other, and they're all
> quite short. Surely you'd make them sections within a chapter, not
> entire chapters.
>
> I do agree that PL/pgsql is more arguable. I can imagine somebody
> writing a book about PostgreSQL and choosing to make that topic into a
> whole chapter.
Yeah, I think there is probably a range of of things from pretty obvious
to mostly controversial.