Re: Isolated databases or instances
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Isolated databases or instances |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7692.1171660568@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Isolated databases or instances (Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Isolated databases or instances
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com> writes: > On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 13:18, Henry, Nigel, CYFD wrote: >> We are at the beginning of the building of a 3-tier >> development/test/uat environment. We would like some advice on how >> the PostgreSQL database should be configured for this environment. > What exactly are you trying to accomplish with multiple PostgreSQL > instances here? I can't see there being any great advantage to three > separate instances than having three discrete databases defined in one > instance. Separating development and production instances seems perfectly sensible to me. For instance, if your development code triggers a crash in Postgres, you don't really want that event to take out your production sessions. Also, you might want to run Postgres version x+1 for awhile as development before replacing version x for production. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: