Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7678.1136226380@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf? (Jon Jensen <jon@endpoint.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jon Jensen <jon@endpoint.com> writes: > (1) What Tom proposed is that we store the hostname and do a new DNS > lookup for every connection. That could be useful in certain situations, > but I wouldn't use it for a busy production server. The additional time > for DNS lookups (even with a fast local caching nameserver) would not be a > price I'd want to pay for the convenience. Can you demonstrate that this is actually a serious concern next to the total time spent launching a backend? I can't measure any real change in total time for "psql -l" when log_hostname is enabled, which should be a comparable hit. I started out proposing a one-line change. The odds of this ever getting done drop by an order of magnitude every time someone proposes another order-of-magnitude increase in the work required... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: