Re: What's needed for cache-only table scan?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: What's needed for cache-only table scan? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7667.1384273791@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: What's needed for cache-only table scan? (Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: What's needed for cache-only table scan?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp> writes: > 2013/11/12 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>: >> There's no possible way you'll finish this for 9.4. > Yes, I understand it is not possible to submit whole of the patch until > CF3 deadline. So, I'd like to find out a way to implement it as an > extension using facilities being supported or to be enhanced on v9.4. Oh! Okay, I misunderstood the context --- you meant this as an example use-case for the custom plan feature, right? Makes more sense now. I'm still dubious that it'd actually be very useful in itself, but it seems reasonable as a test case to make sure that a set of hooks for custom plans are sufficient to do something useful with. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: