Re: GNU/Hurd portability patches

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alexander Lakhin
Тема Re: GNU/Hurd portability patches
Дата
Msg-id 766311fc-c075-47cf-92fb-4876c258f23c@gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: GNU/Hurd portability patches  (Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net>)
Ответы Re: GNU/Hurd portability patches
Список pgsql-hackers
Hello Michael and Tom,

Thank you for spending time on this!

24.09.2025 13:45, Michael Banck wrote:
btw, the stats test failed in a similar way on hamerkop (Windows Server
2016) once, 35 days ago:
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=hamerkop&dt=2025-08-19%2013%3A56%3A17

Yes, and all of such failures are counted at [1].
And we had discussed that (Windows-specific) anomaly too: [2]. Probably
something has changed in that environment, so that we see no such failures
for the last month.

How much timer resolution do we require from the system? GNU Mach seems
to (at least try to) guarantee that the timer won't go backwards, but it
does not guarantee (currently) that two consecutive clock_gettime()
calls will return something different in all cases.

Regarding the lowest timer resolution, as I mentioned at [3], 32k_counter
gives only 0.030517 sec...

[1] https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Known_Buildfarm_Test_Failures#subscription.sql_sporadically_fails_on_hamerkop_due_to_zero_time_difference
[2] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CANhcyEX4hH9POyTM3vh%3D58newEF0%3DqgK46xF5i-RDir2zAZ4og%40mail.gmail.com
[3] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/af1d252c-738f-46ab-99c6-a00e0d65aa04%40gmail.com

Best regards,
Alexander

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: