Re: wCTE: about the name of the feature
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: wCTE: about the name of the feature |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7653.1298698225@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: wCTE: about the name of the feature (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: wCTE: about the name of the feature
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > Yay! I'm excited about this, particularly the possible "pipelining" > stuff, where you can do WITH (DELETE .. RETURNING ..) INSERT ... and > have it be like cool and fast and stuff. > Or at least I hope you can do that. It's gonna need some work yet. As things stand, the tuples are indeed pipelined through, but the CteScan nodes *also* stash them aside into tuplestores, just in case somebody demands a rescan. Fixing that will require revisiting the exec flags (EXEC_FLAG_REWIND etc). We don't currently distinguish "it's unlikely you'll have to rescan" from "you're guaranteed not to have to rescan", but a CteScan that's covering a ModifyTable has to know the latter to not have to keep hold of copies of the RETURNING tuples. It might be a small enough change to do after alpha starts, but I don't have time for it right now. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: