Re: pg_rewind WAL segments deletion pitfall
От | torikoshia |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_rewind WAL segments deletion pitfall |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 763cac924055f1669578bea950c667c7@oss.nttdata.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_rewind WAL segments deletion pitfall (Alexander Kukushkin <cyberdemn@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_rewind WAL segments deletion pitfall
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thanks for the patch. I tested the v6 patch using the test script attached on [1], old primary has succeeded to become new standby. I have very minor questions on the regression tests mainly regarding the consistency with other tests for pg_rewind: > +setup_cluster; > +create_standby; Would it be better to add parentheses? Also should we add "RewindTest::" for these function? > +primary_psql("create table t(a int)"); > +primary_psql("insert into t values(0)"); > +primary_psql("select pg_switch_wal()"); .. Should 'select', 'create', etc be capitalized? > my $false = "$^X -e 'exit(1)'"; I feel it's hard to understand what does this mean. Isn't it better to add comments and describe this is for windows environments? -- Regards, -- Atsushi Torikoshi NTT DATA Group Corporation
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: