Re: Bug with dump/restore when using UNION and ORDER BY in views
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bug with dump/restore when using UNION and ORDER BY in views |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7639.1028439037@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bug with dump/restore when using UNION and ORDER BY in views ("Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bug with dump/restore when using UNION and ORDER BY in views
|
Список | pgsql-sql |
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes: >> Yeah. This is fixed in current sources, and I back-patched it into >> the REL7_2 branch, but current plans don't seem to include a 7.2.2 >> release --- we'll be going straight to 7.3 beta instead. > Is it worth doing a 7.2.2 patch that will dump people's foreign keys as > ALTER TABLE/ADD FOREIGN KEY instead of a bunch of CREATE CONSTRAINT > TRIGGERs, so that they actually become constraints in 7.3? I don't think it's any easier to do that as a backpatch than as new functionality in 7.3 pg_dump. As far as the general issue of a 7.2.2 release goes, I'm personally in favor of one --- there are several important bugfixes in the 7.2 branch right now --- but I don't do the gruntwork for patch releases, so I can't complain too much. > Also Tom - did you check if you can CREATE CONSTRAINT TRIGGER on a dropped > column - I think I neglected to look at that in the patch I submitted > originally. I'm pretty sure that won't get past the ATTNAME cache patches, but try it... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: