Re: [WIP] pg_ping utility
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [WIP] pg_ping utility |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7632.1350342774@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [WIP] pg_ping utility (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [WIP] pg_ping utility
Re: [WIP] pg_ping utility |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > Why not add a pg_ctl subcommand for that? For me that sounds like a good place > for it... I think that's a bad fit, because every other pg_ctl subcommand requires access to the data directory. It would be very confusing if this one subcommand worked remotely when the others didn't. There was also some discussion of wedging it into psql, which would at least have the advantage that it'd typically be installed on the right side of the client/server divide. But I still think "wedging into" is the appropriate verb there: psql is a tool for making a connection and executing some SQL commands, and "ping" is not that. Yeah, I know a whole new executable is kind of a pain, and the amount of infrastructure and added maintenance seems a bit high compared to what this does. But a lot of the programs in src/bin/scripts are not much bigger. (In fact that might be the best place for this.) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: