Re: Don't try fetching future segment of a TLI.
От | David Steele |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Don't try fetching future segment of a TLI. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 762ffb60-df9c-0efc-2714-9859219157e3@pgmasters.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Don't try fetching future segment of a TLI. (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Don't try fetching future segment of a TLI.
Re: Don't try fetching future segment of a TLI. |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/6/20 1:43 PM, Fujii Masao wrote: > > > On 2020/03/19 22:22, Pavel Suderevsky wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've tested patch provided by Kyotaro and do confirm it fixes the issue. > > The patch looks good to me. Attached is the updated version of the patch. > I updated only comments. > > Barring any objection, I will commit this patch. The patch looks good to me. >> Any chance it will be merged to one of the next minor releases? > > This doesn't seem a bug, so I'm thinking to merge this to next *major* > version release, i.e., v13. Not a bug, perhaps, but I think we do consider back-patching performance problems. The rise in S3 usage has just exposed how poorly this performed code in high-latency environments. Regards, -- -David david@pgmasters.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: