Re: VALUES() evaluation order
От | Steve Atkins |
---|---|
Тема | Re: VALUES() evaluation order |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 762CE8D5-B5D9-4A6D-A2AB-8CB9A4B90599@blighty.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: VALUES() evaluation order (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Jan 13, 2013, at 2:36 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com> writes: >> Is the order in which the expressions in a VALUES() clause defined? >> I'm doing this: INSERT INTO foo (a, b) VALUES (nextval('bar'), currval('bar')) > >> It works fine, but I'm wondering whether it's guaranteed to work or whether I'm relying on an artifact of the implementation. > > I'd say it's an artifact. It probably does work reliably at the moment, > but if we had a reason to change it we'd not feel much compunction about > doing so. (The most obvious potential reason to change it is parallel > evaluation of expressions, which is a long way off, so you probably > don't have any near-term reason to worry. But ...) > > Consider sticking the nextval() into a WITH. Thanks. WITH it is, then. Cheers, Steve
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: