Re: MaxOffsetNumber for Table AMs

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Davis
Тема Re: MaxOffsetNumber for Table AMs
Дата
Msg-id 75e094cdd9b1be5bae0ac1fca166fb882734c920.camel@j-davis.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: MaxOffsetNumber for Table AMs  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Ответы Re: MaxOffsetNumber for Table AMs  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Re: MaxOffsetNumber for Table AMs  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2021-05-05 at 10:48 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> What we have right now has little chance of failing. It also has
> little chance of succeeding (except for something like zheap, which
> can presumably get by with the heapam's idea of TID).

What has little chance of succeeding? Table AMs?

And why isn't columnar an example of someting that can "get by with
heapam's idea of TID"? I mean, it's not a perfect fit, but my primary
complaint this whole thread is that it's undefined, not that it's
completely unworkable.

Regards,
    Jeff Davis





В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: MaxOffsetNumber for Table AMs
Следующее
От: "David G. Johnston"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: COPY table_name (single_column) FROM 'iso-8859-1.txt' DELIMITER E'\n'