Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all thesemonths
От | Erik Rijkers |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all thesemonths |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 75ce7063498186d83bc683c2fe7d97dc@xs4all.nl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all thesemonths (Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all thesemonths
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017-05-26 15:59, Petr Jelinek wrote: > Hi, > > Hmm, I was under the impression that the changes we proposed in the > snapbuild thread fixed your issues, does this mean they didn't? Or the > modified versions of those that were eventually committed didn't? Or > did > issues reappear at some point? I do think the snapbuild fixed solved certain problems. I can't say where the present problems are caused (as I have said, I suspect logical replication, but also my own test-harness: perhaps it leaves some error-state lying around (although I do try hard to prevent that) -- so I just don't know. I wouldn't say that problems (re)appeared at a certain point; my impression is rather that logical replication has become better and better. But I kept getting the odd failure, without a clear cause, but always (eventually) repeatable on other machines. I did the 1-minute pgbench-derail version exactly because of the earlier problems with snapbuild: I wanted a test that does a lot of starting and stopping of publication and subscription. Erik Rijkers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: