Re: autovacuum recommendations for Large tables
От | Laurenz Albe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: autovacuum recommendations for Large tables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 75ca65304d1cb8a4288d1b78cf7adf067dbe354e.camel@cybertec.at обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: autovacuum recommendations for Large tables (Olivier Gautherot <ogautherot@gautherot.net>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 2020-11-17 at 22:17 +0100, Olivier Gautherot wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 12:05 AM David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 3:57 PM Atul Kumar <akumar14871@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I only have this one big table in the database of size 3113 GB with rows 7661353111. > > > > > > Right Now the autovacuum setting for that table is set to > > > {autovacuum_enabled=true,autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor=0.2,autovacuum_analyze_scale_factor=0.2} > > > > auto-vacuum doesn't care directly about absolute size, it cares about change (relative to absolute size in many cases,hence the scale factors). > > > > David J. > > > > David is correct. > > If it helps, I put together a few thoughts and own experience on a blog: > https://sites.google.com/gautherot.net/postgresql/vacuum > > Hope you find it useful. Then I can chime in with https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com/en/tuning-autovacuum-postgresql/ Yours, Laurenz Albe
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: