Re: Online verification of checksums
От | Tomas Vondra |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Online verification of checksums |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 75ad93fd-faf9-571b-fbc6-befdebf9fd80@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Online verification of checksums (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Online verification of checksums
Re: Online verification of checksums |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/2/19 12:03 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 10:37 AM Michael Banck > <michael.banck@credativ.de> wrote: >> I have added a retry for this as well now, without a pg_sleep() as well. >> This catches around 80% of the half-reads, but a few slip through. At >> that point we bail out with exit(1), and the user can try again, which I >> think is fine? > > Maybe I'm confused here, but catching 80% of torn pages doesn't sound > robust at all. > FWIW I don't think this qualifies as torn page - i.e. it's not a full read with a mix of old and new data. This is partial write, most likely because we read the blocks one by one, and when we hit the last page while the table is being extended, we may only see the fist 4kB. And if we retry very fast, we may still see only the first 4kB. regards -- Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: