Re: GSoC 2019 - report & feedback
От | Justin Clift |
---|---|
Тема | Re: GSoC 2019 - report & feedback |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7595bf313d2d45c947d22bfa112653dd@postgresql.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | GSoC 2019 - report & feedback ("Ila B." <ilaria.battiston@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-www |
On 2019-08-25 09:35, Ila B. wrote: <snip> > For anyone who is interested in reading more about it and setting it > up, here are the docs: > https://github.com/PGPerfFarm/pgperffarm/tree/master > <https://github.com/PGPerfFarm/pgperffarm/tree/master> > Previous version: https://github.com/PGPerfFarm/pgperffarm/tree/dev > <https://github.com/PGPerfFarm/pgperffarm/tree/dev> > > Note that the most relevant missing features are: > - customisable time span of status page > - client code (Python script to generate results) still buggy, issues > with paths > - missing postgresql.org <http://postgresql.org/> authentication (work > in progress!) > > Feel free to leave me any suggestions and ask any questions :) Looks like you've spent a bunch of time on it. :) Just logged in, and although I can see various machines already set up, there don't seem to be any test results I can look through. Was hoping there would be, as I'm a bit unclear (personally) what kind of perf testing is done, and/or how the results are displayed. ;) Looked through the GitHub repo, the readme and report.md seemed focused on the specifics of the web application, not really covering the info of "what does this do?" in a way I (a complete newbie to your project) would grok. Maybe add some screenshots near the top of the GitHub readme, and the website landing page, showing a completed perf testing result would fix the info gap? :) Regards and best wishes, Justin Clift
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: